Forums » Kids Reviews

  • Adrien
    • 20 posts
    January 2, 2016 2:44 PM EST

    Why was it such a flop? I saw it and I thought it was ok not the best Peter Pan movie I have seen the one with Jeremy Sumpter is way better but wow it came and went so fast.

  • Sofine
    • 66 posts
    January 2, 2016 9:45 PM EST

    Pan was a mess, a pile of junk a flop.

  • Front_Row_Center
    • 68 posts
    January 3, 2016 1:37 AM EST

    It flopped because kids did not want to see it, the young audience stayed away in droves.

    The film cost $150 Million to produced and made under $35 Million in the USA, it did better at foreign box-office but still came in under the production cost.

    I don't think the film was a total disaster as some claim but it did misfire, want to see Peter Pan films that are more fun check out the 2003 Version with Jeremy Sumpter or Hook with Robin Williams. (RIP).

    I also think it is time to give these Peter Pan film versions a rest.

  • Jeff_Wincott
    • 93 posts
    January 3, 2016 2:24 PM EST

    It also did not help that "Pan" was panned by the critics.

    Worldwide it still lost big time the 150 Mill budget worldwide brought in under 127 Million..ouch.

  • JakeT
    • 5 posts
    January 3, 2016 10:11 PM EST

    Pan sucked.

  • Problem Child
    • 15 posts
    January 8, 2016 11:44 PM EST

    Pan was crap, thats my review.

  • Film_Fan
    • 53 posts
    February 20, 2016 7:00 PM EST
    Oh it was bad,  enough of these adaptations of Peter Pan.